Home » Economics » AN ASSESSMENT OF IMPACT OF TAX INCENTIVE ON THE PERFORMANCE AND PRODUCTIVITY AND...

AN ASSESSMENT OF IMPACT OF TAX INCENTIVE ON THE PERFORMANCE AND PRODUCTIVITY AND PROFITABILITY OF MANUFACTURING FIRMS IN NIGERIA

Sold By: | Item Type: Project Material | Report this?  |  Attributes: 59 pages | 1-5 chapters | Amount: ₦5,000 | Marked useful: 2,515 times

Delivery: Within 24 hours

AN ASSESSMENT OF IMPACT OF TAX INCENTIVE ON THE PERFORMANCE AND PRODUCTIVITY AND PROFITABILITY OF MANUFACTURING FIRMS IN NIGERIA

CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background Of The Study

Industrialization culminates in the long-term maintenance of firm production. It denotes the addition of value to a factor input and its efficiency, with additional input resulting in increased organizational performance. The ultimate impact of growing industrialization is projected to be seen in the production of employment for long-term development and economic diversification. Specifically, increased household consumption is a result of improved commodity value and price quality, as well as the growth of other primary sectors (Rapuluchukwu, Belmondo, & Ibukun, 2016). Despite these advantages, most African countries have relied heavily on primary products as their key export asset (UNECA, 2015), and the competitiveness of other industries (aside from agriculture), such as manufacturing companies, has remained a point of concern for policymakers and researchers. For example, there have been many demands for African economies to undergo systemic transformations from low-value-added activities to higher-value-added activities (IMF, 2016). Many major manufacturing companies have moved or restructured their activities, preferring to support the local market by producing poor quality goods (Uwaoma and Ordu, 2016). This indicates that many manufacturing companies, particularly those in Nigeria, are having performance issues, with many giving low profit alerts due to operating environment issues (Wadesango N, 2020). One of the main drivers of the high cost of doing business faced by manufacturing companies, and thus impeding their growth, was the issue of excessive taxation in the form of high tax rates, double and multiple taxation (Uwalomwa, Ranti, Kingsley, and Chinenye, 2016). Also, any of the issues faced by manufacturing companies, according to Uwalomwa et al. (2016), involve a difficult and unfavorable operational atmosphere owing to infrastructural deficiencies and a lack of funds to support capital projects such as expansion.

Excessive taxes in the form of high tax rates, double and triple taxation are often factors that stymie the growth of manufacturing businesses. While taxation is a significant source of government income, it can have a detrimental impact on manufacturing companies if it is not correctly implemented and managed. Higher tax rates deter companies from investing and expanding because they leave them with less capital to reinvest. Industrial performance, productivity, and profitability levels inevitably suffer as a result of this.

According to Uwalomwa et al. (2016), The Nigerian government has introduced a variety of tax incentives to promote the development of local manufacturing companies and other firms, with the primary aim of reducing the quantity of imported products in order to encourage investment, growth, competitiveness, and viability in the manufacturing sector. Tax holidays, tax reductions, capital credits, and benefits for exports and production areas are examples of such tax incentives. The majority of the tax incentives for the manufacturing industry were critical measures to reactivate dormant factories, raise the survival rates of those businesses, and, as a result, recruit thousands of unemployed workers (Fakile & Uwuigbe, 2018).

Hence, with the view of the above, this study was carried out to examine the impact of the tax incentive on the performance, productivity, and profitability of manufacturing firms in Nigeria.

1.2 Statement Of The Problem

The Nigerian manufacturing sector is critical to the development of the national economy, poverty alleviation, and collaboration with larger corporations. They are a significant source of local supply for both large companies and individual customers. They typically have extensive knowledge of local infrastructure, buying trends, and supply patterns (Adefeso, 2018). However, according to World Bank statistics, Nigerian manufacturers have experienced stagnation and declining income over the last five years as a result of a volatile operating climate (World Bank, 2016). Large manufacturing companies (from all sectors) are reported to have lost 70% of their market share in East and West Africa, owing largely to high operating costs (RoK, 2014, cited in Wentzel, 2017). The prospects for manufacturing companies are considerable, but the obstacles are also significant (Ekeno, 2010 cited in Philips, 2016). In general, the average growth percentage in the manufacturing sector has remained stable at three to four percent over the years.

Notably, researchers have conducted studies on tax incentives and their effects on the national economy, but none has looked at their impact on the output of manufacturing firms. As a result, this study seeks to fill this void by investigating the impact of the tax incentive on the performance, productivity, and profitability of manufacturing firms in Nigeria. The studies conducted by Onyango (2015), which explored the impact of tax incentives on the financial performance of five-star hotels, also revealed a research gap. Since it concentrated on five-star hotels, the report showed a conceptual void. Hence, this research will concentrate on manufacturing firms.

1.3 Objectives Of The Study

The primary goal of this research is to examine the impact of the tax incentive on the performance, productivity, and profitability of manufacturing firms in Nigeria. The specific objectives include:

(1) To examine the impact of tax incentives on the performance of manufacturing companies in Nigeria

(2) to examine the impact of tax incentives on the productivity of manufacturing companies in Nigeria.

(3) to examine the impact of tax incentives on the profitability of manufacturing companies in Nigeria.

1.4 Research Hypothesis

The following hypothetical statements will be tested in the course of this study:

H01: Tax incentives have no positive impact on the performance of manufacturing companies in Nigeria.

H02: Tax incentives have no positive impact on the productivity of manufacturing companies in Nigeria.

H03: Tax incentives have no positive impact on the profitability of manufacturing companies in Nigeria.

1.5 Significance of the Study

The study findings would be of great value to the government through various agencies by serving as a foundation for assessing the effectiveness of various tax incentives provided by the government in promoting the performance of manufacturing companies and thus providing a framework and foundation for reviewing the various tax policies based on the cost-benefit analysis provided, which will enable the government to choose which incentives to give priority or eliminate.

The study's results would also educate corporate tax payers and investors about how to profit from current tax incentives as well as serve as a guideline for making informed decisions on which tax incentives are more advantageous to leverage.

The study's results will add to the increasing body of research in this field and help explain the impact of tax incentives on company performance. The study will serve as a resource for other scholars who wish to conduct additional research in this field, and it may spark new lines of inquiry.

1.6 Scope Of The Study

This study is focused on assessing the impact of tax incentives on the performance, productivity, and profitability of manufacturing firms in Nigeria. Hence, the study will be limited to selected manufacturing firms in Ogun State, Nigeria.

1.7. Limitations Of The Study

In the course of carrying out this study, the researcher experienced some constraints, which included time constraints, financial constraints, language barriers, and the attitude of the respondents.

In addition, there was the element of researcher bias. Here, the researcher possessed some biases that may have been reflected in the way the data was collected, the type of people interviewed or sampled, and how the data gathered was interpreted thereafter. The potential for all this to influence the findings and conclusions could not be downplayed. 

More so, the findings of this study are limited to the sample population in the study area, hence they may not be suitable for use in comparison to other companies.

1.8 Definition Of The Study

Tax: a tax is a compulsory financial charge or some other type of levy imposed on a taxpayer by a governmental organization in order to fund government spending and various public expenditures.

Tax incentive: A tax incentive is an aspect of a country's tax code designed to incentivize or encourage a particular economic activity by reducing tax payments for a company in the said country.


This material content is developed to serve as a GUIDE for students to conduct academic research



Delivery: Within 24 hours

  • Reference(s):

    yes available

  • Methodology: yes available


Advertise Here

For advertisement, call 08168958821

Not what you were looking for? Perform a search

What's your project topic?


Comment on Facebook: