AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE INTERSECTION OF OFFICE POLITICS AND EMPLOYEE MENTAL HEALTH IN PUBLIC ENTERPRISE

Chapter One

Introduction

Background to the Study

The intricate dynamics of office politics and their impact on employee mental health have garnered significant attention in recent years. According to Ferris & Kacmar (2018), office politics, defined as the strategies individuals employ to gain advantage within an organization, often manifest through behaviors such as manipulation, favoritism, and backstabbing. Pfeffer (2020) defined organizational politics as a general term that signifies power relation and influence tactics that is utilized by a group of people in a workplace. Andrews (2021) in their study gave exemplary instances of political behaviours like sidestepping chain of command to gain endorsement, going through improper channels to obtain work-kit that are ordinarily should be given to employees to carry out their tasks, as well as lobbying managers before promotion decisions are made. These actions, though sometimes subtle, can create a toxic work environment that significantly affects the mental health of employees 

Mental health, as defined by the World Health Organization (2020), is a state of well-being in which individuals realize their abilities, can cope with the normal stresses of life, work productively, and contribute to their community. The workplace, being a significant part of an individual's life, plays a crucial role in influencing mental health. The pressure to conform to organizational norms, coupled with the stress of navigating office politics, can lead to various mental health issues, including anxiety, depression, and burnout (Hogan & Holland, 2021). The public enterprise sector, characterized by its complex bureaucratic processes and often rigid hierarchical structures, presents a unique environment where office politics can thrive, thereby impacting employees' mental well-being.

Apparently, the intersection of office politics and mental health is particularly pertinent in public enterprises, where bureaucratic structures and hierarchical systems can exacerbate the prevalence of political behaviors. Public enterprises, being government-owned and controlled organizations, often have unique workplace cultures that can either mitigate or intensify the effects of office politics (Poon, 2019). Research indicates that office politics are prevalent across various organizations but are particularly pronounced in public enterprises due to their structure and governance. Buchanan & Badham (2020) assert that in such settings, employees often engage in political behaviors to secure promotions, gain favor, or avoid punitive actions, leading to an environment of distrust and competition rather than collaboration. This atmosphere can have detrimental effects on mental health, as employees may experience heightened stress, reduced job satisfaction, and a diminished sense of well-being. The relationship between office politics and mental health is thus a critical area of concern, particularly in public enterprises where the stakes are high, and the consequences of political behavior can be far-reaching.

Contextually, the Nigerian public enterprise sector, like many others globally, is not immune to these challenges. The intersection of office politics and employee mental health within this sector is an area that requires urgent attention, given the critical role these organizations play in the economy and society at large. Akanbi & Ofoegbu (2019) argued that public enterprises in Nigeria are often seen as arenas where power struggles and political maneuvering are common, leading to a work environment that can be stressful and detrimental to employees' mental health. The cultural context of Nigeria, with its emphasis on hierarchical respect and authority, further complicates the dynamics of office politics, making it a potent force in shaping workplace interactions and, by extension, employees' mental health.

In addition to the immediate effects on mental health, Huseni & Halimat (2021) opined thatthe long-term implications of a politically charged work environment are significant. This is because employees who constantly navigate office politics may experience chronic stress, which can lead to severe mental health issues and impact their overall quality of life. Moreover, Adebayo & Adekunle (2023) established that the productivity and effectiveness of public enterprises are likely to suffer, as employees who are mentally distressed are less likely to perform optimally. The cost to the organization includes not only decreased productivity but also increased absenteeism, higher turnover rates, and potential reputational damage. As such, understanding the intersection of office politics and mental health is not only important for employee well-being but also for the overall effectiveness and sustainability of public enterprises. Given the prevalence of office politics and its profound impact on employee mental health, this study seeks to investigate this intersection within the context of public enterprises in Nigeria. 

1.2 Statement of the Problem

The impact of office politics on employee mental health is an area that has been extensively studied in various organizational contexts. However, there remains a significant gap in understanding how these dynamics play out in public enterprises, particularly in developing countries like Nigeria. Existing studies have predominantly focused on private sector organizations, where the structures and culture differ markedly from those of public enterprises. The unique challenges of public enterprises, including bureaucratic inefficiencies, hierarchical rigidity, and political interference, create an environment where office politics can thrive, potentially leading to significant mental health issues among employees (Buchanan & Badham, 2020). Despite this, there is a paucity of research that specifically addresses the intersection of office politics and mental health in public enterprises, leaving a critical gap in the literature.

In Nigeria, public enterprises are a significant part of the economy, providing essential services and employment to a large segment of the population. However, these organizations are often characterized by high levels of office politics, which can create a toxic work environment (Akanbi & Ofoegbu, 2019). Employees in these settings may face undue stress and pressure, leading to mental health challenges that affect not only their well-being but also their productivity and overall job satisfaction. Despite the prevalence of these issues, there is limited empirical evidence on how office politics specifically impacts mental health within Nigerian public enterprises. This gap in knowledge underscores the need for a focused investigation into this critical area.

Moreover, the existing literature on office politics and mental health often overlooks the contextual factors that may influence these dynamics in public enterprises. For instance, the socio-cultural context of Nigeria, with its emphasis on respect for authority and hierarchical structures, may exacerbate the effects of office politics on mental health (Bolino et al., 2021). Employees may find themselves in situations where they have to navigate complex power dynamics, leading to increased stress and anxiety. Yet, there is little research that considers these contextual factors, leading to a gap in understanding how office politics affects mental health in this specific setting. This study aims to fill this gap by examining the intersection of office politics and mental health in Nigerian public enterprises, taking into account the unique socio-cultural and organizational context.

Furthermore, while there is a growing recognition of the importance of mental health in the workplace, many public enterprises in Nigeria lack adequate policies and support systems to address mental health issues arising from office politics. This lack of attention to mental health in the workplace can have serious consequences, not only for the affected employees but also for the overall performance and sustainability of the organization (Hogan & Holland, 2021). The absence of targeted interventions and support systems in public enterprises exacerbates the problem, leaving employees to navigate these challenges on their own. This study seeks to address this gap by providing evidence-based insights that can inform the development of policies and practices to mitigate the impact of office politics on mental health in public enterprises.

1.3 Objectives of the Study

To examine the prevalence of office politics in public enterprises in Nigeria.

To assess the impact of office politics on employee mental health in public enterprises.

To identify the socio-cultural factors that influence the relationship between office politics and mental health in public enterprises.

To recommend strategies for mitigating the negative effects of office politics on employee mental health in public enterprises.

1.4 Research Questions

What is the prevalence of office politics in public enterprises in Nigeria?

How does office politics impact employee mental health in public enterprises?

What socio-cultural factors influence the relationship between office politics and mental health in public enterprises?

What strategies can be implemented to mitigate the negative effects of office politics on employee mental health in public enterprises?

1.5 Hypothesis

H0: Office politics has no significant impact on employee mental health in public enterprises.

1.6 Significance of the Study

This study holds both practical and theoretical significance. Practically, the findings of this research will provide valuable insights for policymakers, organizational leaders, and human resource professionals in public enterprises. Understanding the impact of office politics on employee mental health can inform the development of strategies and policies aimed at creating healthier work environments, thereby enhancing employee well-being and organizational performance. For public enterprises in Nigeria, where office politics is prevalent, this study's recommendations could lead to more effective management practices that reduce the negative impact of political behavior on employees.

Theoretically, this study contributes to the existing body of knowledge on office politics and mental health by providing a context-specific analysis of these issues in Nigerian public enterprises. By examining the intersection of office politics and mental health within this unique organizational context, the study fills a critical gap in the literature and provides a basis for future research. The findings will also contribute to the development of more nuanced theoretical frameworks that account for the socio-cultural and organizational factors influencing the relationship between office politics and mental health.

1.7 Scope of the Study

This study focuses on the intersection of office politics and employee mental health within public enterprises in Nigeria. Specifically, the research will be conducted in selected public enterprises in Lagos State, Nigeria. The content scope includes the prevalence of office politics, its impact on employee mental health, the socio-cultural factors influencing this relationship, and strategies for mitigating negative outcomes.

1.8 Limitations of the Study

One limitation of this study is the reliance on self-reported data, which may be subject to bias or inaccuracies. Participants may be reluctant to fully disclose the extent of office politics or their mental health challenges due to fear of reprisal or social stigma. To mitigate this, the study will ensure anonymity and confidentiality in data collection and reporting.

Another limitation is the potential generalizability of the findings. Since the study focuses on public enterprises in Lagos State, the results may not be fully applicable to public enterprises in other regions of Nigeria or in different countries with

---

---